People v Matyszewski
2008 NY Slip Op 00118 [47 AD3d 646]
January 8, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 12, 2008


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Marcin Matyszewski, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan Garvin of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Anthea H. Bruffee,and Joseph Huttler of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.),rendered September 20, 2005, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a juryverdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in refusing to admit intoevidence a recording of the defendant's telephone call to 911 as an exception to the hearsay rule.The record indicates that the defendant made his exculpatory statements to the 911 operator afterhe had the time to reflect and possibly fabricate a story (see People v Sostre, 51 NY2d958, 960 [1980]; People v Dalton, 217 AD2d 587, 588 [1995], affd sub nom. Peoplev Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561 [1996]; People v Wilson, 123 AD2d 457, 457-458 [1986]).Accordingly, the recording was not admissible into evidence either as an excited utterance or apresent sense impression (see People v Vasquez, 88 NY2d 561, 574-575 [1996];People v Dalton, 217 AD2d at 588). Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dickerson, JJ.,concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.