| People v Rose |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 00548 [47 AD3d 848] |
| January 22, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Laquan Rose, Appellant. |
—[*1] Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Jodi L. Mandel, andJoshua Carlton of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Konviser,J.), rendered May 26, 2005, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the thirddegree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contentions concerning the prosecutor's remarks during summation areunpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Gillespie, 36 AD3d 626[2007]) and, in any event, are without merit.
Furthermore, since the prosecutor's remarks during summation were proper, the defendant'scontention that he received ineffective counsel based solely upon a failure to object to theprosecutor's summation is without merit. Spolzino, J.P., Ritter, Miller and Dickerson, JJ., concur.