People v Nash
2008 NY Slip Op 01035 [48 AD3d 837]
February 7, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 16, 2008


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jack T. Nash,Appellant.

[*1]Eugene P. Grimmick, Troy, for appellant.

Richard J. McNally Jr., District Attorney, Troy (Anne L. Coonrad of counsel), forrespondent.

Malone Jr., J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Rensselaer County (Jacon, J.),rendered April 12, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attemptedcriminal sexual act in the first degree.

Defendant pleaded guilty to the crime of attempted criminal sexual act in the first degree,stemming from an incident involving attempted oral sexual contact with a 12-year-old boy.Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, defendant waived his right to appeal and was sentencedto a prison term of seven years with three years of postrelease supervision. Defendant nowappeals, contending that his guilty plea was not voluntarily or knowingly entered because he wasnot informed of the long-term impact of his required registration under the Sex OffenderRegistration Act (see Correction Law art 6-C).

While defendant's challenge to the voluntariness of his plea survives his waiver of the rightto appeal, the claim has not been preserved for appellate review by a motion to withdraw theguilty plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction (see People v Missimer, 32 AD3d 1114, 1114 [2006], lvdenied 7 NY3d 927 [2006]; Peoplev Turner, 27 AD3d 962, 962 [2006]; People v Santalucia, 19 AD3d 806, 807 [2005], lv denied 5NY3d 856 [2005]). Moreover, were we to consider the claim, we would find it to be withoutmerit. Defendant was advised, prior to entering his plea, that he would be required to register as asex offender upon his release from [*2]prison. Even if he was not,certification under the Sex Offender Registration Act is a collateral consequence of the plea(see People v Clark, 261 AD2d 97, 100 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 833 [2000]),and the failure to inform a defendant that he or she will be subject to its requirements will notundermine the voluntariness of a guilty plea (see People v Ellis, 46 AD3d 934, 935 [2007]; People v Vere, 44 AD3d 690,691-692 [2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 1010 [2007]; People v Coss, 19 AD3d 943, 943 [2005], lv denied 5NY3d 805 [2005]; People vKeebler, 15 AD3d 724, 726 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 854 [2005]).

Peters, J.P., Carpinello, Rose and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.