People v Ludwigsen
2008 NY Slip Op 01173 [48 AD3d 484]
February 5, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 16, 2008


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Leonard Ludwigsen, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan M. Kratter of counsel), for appellant, andappellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Shulamit Rosenblum,and Flora Tartakovsky of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.),rendered January 19, 2005, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict,and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant's contention that the jury's rejection of his extreme emotional disturbancedefense was against the weight of the evidence is without merit (see Penal Law §125.25 [1] [a]; People v Azaz, 41AD3d 610 [2007]). Even had the jury found that the defendant was acting under theinfluence of extreme emotional disturbance at the time of the murder, it was entitled to reject hisproffered excuse for this emotional state as unreasonable and not warranting mitigation (seePeople v Yong Ho Han, 200 AD2d 780 [1994]).

The defendant's remaining contentions, raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are withoutmerit. Fisher, J.P., Lifson, Covello and McCarthy, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.