People v Hogabone
2008 NY Slip Op 02510 [49 AD3d 1027]
March 20, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 14, 2008


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jason R.Hogabone, Appellant.

[*1]Denise J. Kerrigan, Cornwallville, for appellant.

Louise K. Sira, District Attorney, Johnstown (Chad W. Brown of counsel), forrespondent.

Rose, J. Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Fulton County (Giardino, J.),rendered August 31, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglaryin the third degree.

After defendant made incriminating statements about a number of burglaries, he was indictedfor burglary in the third degree (four counts), grand larceny (one count) and petit larceny (threecounts). When County Court denied suppression of his statements to police and the items foundduring a search of his car, defendant pleaded guilty to one count of burglary in the third degree insatisfaction of the indictment and waived his right to appeal. County Court sentenced defendant,as a second felony offender, to 3 to 6 years in prison, prompting this appeal.

Defendant acknowledged and waived his right to appeal orally and in a detailed writingfollowing a thorough advisement of his rights by County Court during the plea colloquy. Thecourt specifically told defendant that his waiver would mean that there would be no appellatereview of its suppression rulings. Also, in the written waiver, defendant acknowledged that hehad discussed the consequences of his waiver with his counsel. Thus, defendant knowingly,voluntarily and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]; People v Fludd, 33 AD3d 1124,1125 [2006], lv denied 9 NY3d 843 [2007]). [*2]Accordingly, defendant's challenges to County Court's suppressionrulings are precluded (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]; People v Hunt, 29 AD3d 1081,1083 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 813 [2006]), and his challenge to the admission ofevidence at the Huntley/Mapp hearing and to the severity of the sentence imposed areforeclosed (see People v Lopez, 6NY3d 248, 255 [2006]; People vRomano, 45 AD3d 910, 912 [2007]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Carpinello and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment isaffirmed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.