Brown v New York City Tr. Auth.
2008 NY Slip Op 03111 [50 AD3d 377]
April 10, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, June 18, 2008


Crystal Brown, Appellant,
v
New York City TransitAuthority, Respondent.

[*1]Thomas Torto, New York, for appellant.

Wallace Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Faviola Soto, J.), entered October 13, 2006,after a jury trial, in defendant's favor, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff's argument that the verdict was irreconcilably inconsistent is unpreserved, since thisissue was not raised prior to discharge of the jury (see Martinez v New York City Tr. Auth., 41 AD3d 174 [2007]).Moreover, this matter does not present a situation where the questions of negligence andproximate cause are inextricably interwoven (see Dwight v New York City Tr. Auth., 30 AD3d 270 [2006],lv denied 7 NY3d 711 [2006]). The jury's determination that defendant's negligence wasnot a substantial factor in causing plaintiff's injury was not inconsistent or against the weight ofthe evidence (see id.). Finally, the trial court properly rejected plaintiff's attempt toimpeach the jury's verdict by the posttrial submission of affidavits from two of its members(see Sharrow v Dick Corp., 86 NY2d 54, 60-61 [1995]). Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P.,Andrias, Gonzalez and Acosta, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.