People v Walker
2008 NY Slip Op 03931 [50 AD3d 1629]
April 25, 2008
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, June 18, 2008


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Frederick E.Walker, Appellant.

[*1]Motion for writ of error coram nobis granted.Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was denied effective assistance of appellate counselbecause counsel failed to raise an issue on direct appeal that would have resulted in reversal,specifically, in failing to argue that he had been deprived of his right to be present at hisSandoval hearing. Upon our review of the trial court proceedings, we conclude that theissue may have merit. Therefore, the order of March 15, 2002 is vacated and this Court willconsider the appeal de novo (see People v LeFrois, 151 AD2d 1046 [1989]). Defendant isdirected to perfect his appeal on or before July 25, 2008. Present—Scudder, P.J., Centra,Pine and Gorski, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.