| Lodovico v Lodovico |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 04475 [51 AD3d 731] |
| May 13, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| Alysen Lodovico, Respondent, v Marcus J. Lodovico,Appellant. |
—[*1] Behrins & Behrins, P.C., Staten Island, N.Y. (Susan R. Schneider of counsel), forrespondent.
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, with one bill of costs.
"The evaluation of what constitutes reasonable counsel fees is a matter within the sounddiscretion of the trial court" (Lefkowitz v Van Ess, 166 AD2d 556 [1990]; citingDeCabrera v Cabrera-Rosete, 70 NY2d 879, 881 [1987]). The trial court is in the bestposition to judge the factors integral to determining counsel fees, such as the time, effort, andskill required (see Feldman v Feldman, 194 AD2d 207, 219 [1993]). Moreover, "[a] courtmust consider the equities and circumstances of each particular case and their respective financialpositions in determining a counsel fee application" (Palumbo v Palumbo, 10 AD3d 680, 682 [2004]).
Here, the plaintiff adduced evidence demonstrating that she was entitled to an attorney's feein the sum of $15,000 for successfully opposing the defendant's motions to reduce his childsupport [*2]obligations. In view of this evidence, the SupremeCourt providently exercised its discretion in granting the plaintiff's motion for an attorney's fee tothe extent of awarding her the sum of $15,000.
The defendant's remaining contentions are without merit. Mastro, J.P., Skelos, Lifson andLeventhal, JJ., concur.