People v Neptune
2008 NY Slip Op 04731 [51 AD3d 949]
May 20, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, July 16, 2008


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
JeanNeptune, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Denise A. Cors� of counsel), for appellant, andappellant pro se.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Thomas M. Rossof counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Collini, J.),rendered April 15, 2005, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, upon a juryverdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

On the evening of July 4, 2003 the defendant was driving three people home from abarbecue. Eyewitnesses testified, inter alia, that the defendant was speeding down a busy street,weaving in and out of traffic without signaling, and tailgating other vehicles. At some point, thedefendant lost control of his car, and collided with two other vehicles. One of the passengers inthe defendant's car died as a result of the accident.

The defendant was convicted of manslaughter in the second degree. A person is guilty of thatcrime when he or she "recklessly causes the death of another person" (Penal Law § 125.15[1]).

The Legislature has defined the term "recklessly" in Penal Law § 15.05 (3). TheCriminal Jury Instructions utilize the same definition (see CJI2d[NY] Penal Law §15.05 [3]; § 125.15 [1]). Despite this, in its charge to the jury, the trial court, over defensecounsel's objection, repeatedly defined the term "recklessly" in a manner that substantiallydeviated from the Penal Law definition and from the CJI pattern charge. Under thecircumstances, this constituted error (cf. People v [*2]Simmons, 221 AD2d 994, 995 [1995]), which cannot beconsidered harmless (see People v Crimmins, 36 NY2d 230, 237 [1975]). Accordingly, anew trial is required.

The defendant's remaining contentions, including the contention raised in his supplementalpro se brief, need not be reached in light of our determination. Fisher, J.P., Covello, Angiolilloand Belen, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.