People v Wilson
2008 NY Slip Op 04995
Decided on June 5, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 5, 2008
Tom, J.P., Friedman, Nardelli, Buckley, Renwick, JJ.

3814 5369/06

[*1]The People of the State of New York, Respondent,

v

Everette Wilson, Defendant-Appellant.





Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Laura
Lieberman Cohen of counsel), for appellant.
Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Susan
Gliner of counsel), for respondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Arlene Goldberg, J.), rendered January 26, 2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree and identity theft in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to an aggregate term of 1½ to 3 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. The hearing evidence supports the court's finding that the arresting officer was justified in conducting a common-law inquiry. The officer, who was assigned to a subway station and was watching a surveillance video monitor, saw defendant engaged in furtive behavior at a MetroCard vending machine. The officer recognized this behavior, based upon her training and experience (see People v Valentine, 17 NY2d 128, 132 [1966]), as indicative of criminal activity involving credit cards. Viewed individually and by an untrained observer, defendant's actions, including rapid purchases of multiple MetroCards with multiple credit cards, might not be suspicious, but when viewed collectively and in the light of the officer's expertise, they provided the officer with a founded suspicion of criminal activity warranting a level-two inquiry (see People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223 [1976]). Defendant's response to the officer's questions, and his production of an identification card and a credit card that clearly did not belong to him, provided probable cause for his arrest.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER
OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: JUNE 5, 2008

CLERK


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.