People v Curry
2008 NY Slip Op 05716
Decided on June 17, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 17, 2008
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
RANDALL T. ENG
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.

2007-03427
(Ind. No. 04-00169)

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Michael Curry, appellant.





Arlene Lewis, Blauvelt, N.Y., for appellant.
Thomas P. Zugibe, District Attorney, New City, N.Y. (Carrie A.
Ciganek of counsel), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Rockland County (Bartlett, J.), entered June 29, 2006, which, after a hearing, denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, § 23) on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the first degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon a jury verdict, on January 4, 2005.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant's contention, the County Court providently exercised its discretion in denying his motion for resentencing pursuant to the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738, § 23) on "substantial justice" grounds. The instant conviction, which entailed the possession of a significant amount of crack cocaine, represented the defendant's fourth drug-related felony offense. Further, three of the offenses were committed while the defendant was either on parole or probation. The court considered the defendant's evidence of rehabilitation while incarcerated and found that it did not outweigh the seriousness of the instant offense and his lengthy criminal history (see People v Salcedo, 40 AD3d 356). Under the circumstances, "substantial justice" dictated that the motion be denied (L 2004, ch 738, § 23; see People v Aguirre, 47 AD3d
489; People v Batista, 45 AD3d 396; People v Gonzalez, 29 AD3d 400; cf. People v Beasley, 47 AD3d 639, 641).[*2]
SANTUCCI, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, ENG and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.