People v Stevenson
2008 NY Slip Op 05735
Decided on June 17, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 17, 2008
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ROBERT A. SPOLZINO, J.P.
JOSEPH COVELLO
THOMAS A. DICKERSON
RANDALL T. ENG, JJ.

2005-00939
(Ind. No. 03-1437)

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Floyd Stevenson, appellant. Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (John M. Dowden of counsel), for appellant.





Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Guy
Arcidiacono, Caren C. Manzello, and Edward A. Bannan of counsel;
Stephen Miller on the brief), for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), rendered December 23, 2004, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

Upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]). The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the County Court erroneously admitted the deceased victim's statements into evidence (see People v Smith, 37 AD3d 333; People v Fryar, 29 AD3d 919; People v Paige, 283 AD2d 445) and we decline to review that contention in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction. The defendant's contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to establish his guilt of murder in the second degree is also unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05[2]; People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

The defendant's contentions raised in Points 3, 5, and 6 of his brief are unpreserved for appellate review, and his remaining contentions are without merit.[*2]
SPOLZINO, J.P., COVELLO, DICKERSON and ENG, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.