Matter of Fish v Burge
2008 NY Slip Op 05848
Decided on June 26, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: June 26, 2008

503896

[*1]In the Matter of MARK FISH, Petitioner,

v

JOHN BURGE, as Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility, Respondent.


Calendar Date: May 14, 2008
Before: Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ.


Mark Fish, Elmira, petitioner pro se.
Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany
(Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Chemung County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

After two small wires that were concealed with glue were found running along the floor and into petitioner's prison cell, he was charged in a misbehavior report with possession of an item in a prohibited area, possession of an unauthorized item and misuse of state property. A tier II disciplinary hearing ensued, at the conclusion of which petitioner was found guilty of all charges. That determination was administratively affirmed, prompting this CPLR article 78 proceeding seeking annulment.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, authored by the correction officer who discovered the wires, is sufficient to provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Adams v Goord, 45 AD3d 940, 940-941 [2007]). Further, the details of the misbehavior report were corroborated by the testimony of its author and the testimony of the other officer present when the wires were found. Petitioner's assertions that he was unaware that the wires were in his cell and that someone else placed them there created credibility issues for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Ubaldo v Leclaire, 46 AD3d 975, 975 [2007]). [*2]To the extent preserved, petitioner's remaining contentions, including his claims that the misbehavior report was defective and the confiscated wires were not properly secured and documented, have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Peters, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur.

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.