People v Smith
2008 NY Slip Op 05949
Decided on June 24, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on June 24, 2008
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
ROBERT A. LIFSON, J.P.
JOSEPH COVELLO
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, JJ.

2006-05918
(Ind. No. 05-01056)

[*1]The People, etc., respondent,

v

Conroy Smith, appellant.





Stephen J. Pittari, White Plains, N.Y. (Jacqueline F. Oliva of
counsel), for appellant.
Janet DiFiore, District Attorney, White Plains, N.Y. (Laurie
Sapakoff, Richard Longworth
Hecht, and Anthony J. Servino of counsel),
for respondent.


DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Bellantoni, J.), rendered June 14, 2006, convicting him of assault in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (two counts), and reckless endangerment in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, and a new trial is ordered.

The defendant is entitled to reversal and a new trial based upon the trial court's error in denying his challenge for cause to a prospective juror. The juror indicated during voir dire that he believed he was present at a press conference when the defendant's arrest was announced, he knew the District Attorney of Westchester County socially, he was personal friends with the Assistant District Attorney who had been assigned to the case before trial, and he might know some of the police officers who would be testifying for the People. Trial courts should lean toward disqualifying prospective jurors of dubious impartiality, and considering all of these circumstances, the defendant's challenge for cause as to this juror should have been granted (see People v Rentz, 67 NY2d 829; People v Branch, 46 NY2d 645; People v Maldonado, 278 AD2d 513; People v Clark, [*2]125 AD2d 868).

The defendant's remaining contentions have been rendered academic or are without merit.
LIFSON, J.P., COVELLO, ANGIOLILLO and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.