People v Estrella
2008 NY Slip Op 05962
Decided on July 1, 2008
Court of Appeals
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 1, 2008

No. 186 SSM 20

[*1]The People & c., Respondent,

v

Luis Estrella, Appellant. City of Rochester, Respondent.





Submitted by Chad W. Flansburg, for appellant.
Submitted by Jessica Birkahn Housel, for respondent
People of the State of New York.
Submitted by John G. Rizzo, for respondent City of
Rochester.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The courts below did not err in declining to suppress the cocaine recovered from the defendant's car. The record supports the finding that the officer who stopped the car reasonably believed the windows to be over-tinted in violation of VTL � 375 (12-a) (b) (3). The [*2]officer was not chargeable with knowledge that the tinting was legal in Georgia, where the car was registered.

Defendant's other contentions also lack merit.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur.
Decided July 1, 2008


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.