| Mirkinson v Stonehill Realty Corp. |
| 2008 NY Slip Op 06196 |
| Decided on July 8, 2008 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports. |
Decided on July 8, 2008
FRED T. SANTUCCI, J.P.
DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO
RANDALL T. ENG
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.
2007-09407
(Index No. 11075/06)
v
Stonehill Realty Corp., appellant.
Jacobson & Schwartz, Rockville Centre, N.Y. (Henry J. Cernitz
of counsel), for appellant.
Rosenberg, Minc, Falkoff & Wolff, LLP, New York, N.Y.
(Steven C. Falkoff of counsel), for
respondent.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Knipel, J.), dated September 5, 2007, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendant landlord failed to establish as a matter of law that an alleged defect in the installation of the hood over the stove in the plaintiff tenant's apartment was not apparent at the time he inspected the premises and assumed ownership. Accordingly, its motion for summary judgment was properly denied (see Winegrad v New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 NY2d 851, 853; Hayes v Riverbend Housing Co. Inc., 40 AD3d 500).
SANTUCCI, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, ENG and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court