People v Esposito
2008 NY Slip Op 06315
Decided on July 17, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: July 17, 2008

100220

[*1]THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent,

v

ANTHONY ESPOSITO, Appellant.


Calendar Date: June 11, 2008
Before: Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ.


Andrew Kossover, Public Defender, Kingston (Mari
Ann Connolly Sennett of counsel), for appellant.
Holley Carnright, District Attorney, Kingston (Joan
Gudesblatt Lamb of counsel), for respondent.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Ulster County (Bruhn, J.), rendered January 9, 2006, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree, assault in the second degree (five counts) and endangering the welfare of a child.

Defendant, having grown frustrated with the crying of a three-year-old child he was babysitting, beat the boy with a belt, bit him on the face and inserted a battery into his rectum. As a result, defendant pleaded guilty to a seven-count indictment charging him with aggravated sexual abuse in the first degree, assault in the second degree (five counts) and endangering the welfare of a child. County Court thereafter sentenced defendant consistent with the plea agreement to an aggregate prison term of nine years followed by five years of postrelease supervision. Defendant now appeals, asserting that the sentence imposed was harsh and excessive. We disagree. Noting the reprehensible nature of the crimes perpetrated by defendant against the innocent and helpless victim, we discern neither an abuse of discretion by County Court nor the existence of any extraordinary circumstances warranting a reduction of defendant's sentence in the interest of justice (see People v Reed, 46 AD3d 1221, 1222 [2007]). Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed.

Cardona, P.J., Spain, Lahtinen, Kane and Stein, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.