Weitzenberg v Nassau County Dept. of Recreation & Parks
2008 NY Slip Op 06446
Decided on July 29, 2008
Appellate Division, Second Department
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on July 29, 2008
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
APPELLATE DIVISION : SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J.
HOWARD MILLER
EDWARD D. CARNI
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS, JJ.

2007-05380
(Index No. 28936/92)

[*1]Ira Weitzenberg, et al., plaintiffs, Roberta Miller, appellant,

v

Nassau County Department of Recreation and Parks, et al., respondents.





Louis D. Stober, Jr., LLC, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.
Lorna B. Goodman, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Dennis J.
Saffran of counsel), for respondents.


DECISION & ORDER

In an action, inter alia, for reinstatement and back pay, the plaintiff Roberta Miller appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), dated April 18, 2007, which denied her third motion for leave to renew a prior motion for class certification.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the third motion of the plaintiff Roberta Miller for leave to renew a prior motion for class certification. "A motion for leave to renew must be supported by new facts not offered on the prior motion that would change the prior determination, and the motion shall also contain a reasonable justification for the failure to present such facts on the prior motion" (Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 37 AD3d 594, 594; see Ellner v Schwed, 48 AD3d 739, 740; CPLR 2221[e]). Here, we agree with the Supreme Court that the purportedly new facts were not sufficient to change the prior determination. In addition, Miller failed to offer a reasonable justification for the failure to present those facts in the context of prior motions she made for class certification, two of which have been the subject of appeals to this Court (see Weitzenberg v Nassau County Dept. of Recreation & Parks, 29 AD3d 682; Weitzenberg v Nassau County Dept. of Recreation & Parks, 249 AD2d 538).[*2]

Miller's remaining contentions are without merit
PRUDENTI, P.J., MILLER, CARNI and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.

ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.