Matter of Kelly v Selsky
2008 NY Slip Op 06913 [54 AD3d 1118]
September 18, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, October 29, 2008


In the Matter of Patrick Kelly, Appellant, v Donald Selsky, asDirector of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs,Respondent.

[*1]Patrick Kelly, Rome, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Zwack, J.), entered December 21, 2007 inAlbany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLRarticle 78, to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services findingpetitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, was charged in a misbehavior report with providing unauthorizedlegal assistance, disobeying a direct order and possessing property in an unauthorized area.Petitioner pleaded guilty with an explanation to providing unauthorized legal assistance and wasfound guilty following a tier III disciplinary hearing of disobeying a direct order. He was foundnot guilty of possessing property in an unauthorized area. The determination was administrativelyaffirmed and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued. Supreme Court dismissed the petition,prompting this appeal.

We affirm. Regarding petitioner's claim that he was denied adequate employee assistance, hehas failed to demonstrate, nor does the record reveal, any prejudice suffered by him as a result ofany alleged deficiencies (see Matter ofAbdullah v Goord, 36 AD3d 978, 979 [2007]). As for petitioner's assertion that he wasdenied the right to present witness testimony, he expressly advised the Hearing Officer that hedid not want to call any witnesses (seeMatter of Griffin v Goord, 43 AD3d 591, 592 [2007]). Petitioner's remainingcontentions have been [*2]examined and, to the extent that theyare properly before this Court, are unavailing.

Peters, J.P., Rose, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Stein, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment isaffirmed, without costs.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.