Applehead Pictures LLC v Perelman
2008 NY Slip Op 07594 [55 AD3d 348]
October 7, 2008
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 10, 2008


Applehead Pictures LLC, Respondent,
v
Ronald O.Perelman, Appellant.

—[*1]Cohen Lans LLP, New York (Deborah E. Lans of counsel), for appellant.

Susman Godfrey L.L.P., New York (Jacob W. Buchdahl of counsel), forrespondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Debra A. James, J.), entered March 3, 2008,which denied defendant's motion to disqualify plaintiff's law firm, unanimously affirmed, withcosts.

In order to disqualify the firm representing plaintiff in this breach of contract action,defendant had to demonstrate an attorney-client relationship between the firm and plaintiff'sprincipal, and the existence of a conflict of interest between plaintiff and its principal inconnection with the matter being litigated (see Code of Professional Responsibility DR5-105 [22 NYCRR 1200.24]). Defendant's evidence, consisting of a hearsay internet report, aninformal e-mail and a breakfast meeting, was insufficient to establish any separate attorney-clientrelationship between the firm and plaintiff's principal (see Solow v Grace & Co., 83NY2d 303 [1994]).

We have considered defendant's remaining arguments and find them without merit.Concur—Tom, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ. [See 2008 NYSlip Op 30573(U).]


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.