Matter of Koehl v Artus
2008 NY Slip Op 08576 [56 AD3d 918]
November 13, 2008
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 7, 2009


In the Matter of Edward Koehl, Petitioner, v Dale Artus, asSuperintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility, Respondent.

[*1]Edward Koehl, Dannemora, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J. Mastracco of counsel), forrespondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the SupremeCourt, entered in Clinton County) to review a determination of respondent which foundpetitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner, a prison inmate, reported to the facility's medical records door to pick up copies ofmedical and dental records that he had previously requested. He was asked by the medical clerkto go to the waiting room until she was ready for him, at which time she would call him.Petitioner ultimately returned to his housing location without permission. As a result, petitionerwas found guilty at the conclusion of a tier II disciplinary hearing of disobeying a direct order.That determination was affirmed upon administrative appeal and this CPLR article 78 proceedingseeking annulment ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, authored by the medical clerk involved in the incident,is sufficient, by itself, to provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Adams v Goord, 45AD3d 940, 940-941 [2007]). Although it is true that the report recites that the medical clerk"asked" petitioner to return to the waiting room until she was ready for him, it is clear that, whenthe report is considered in its entirety, it demonstrates that the clerk gave petitioner a directivethat he did not have the option of refusing. To the extent that [*2]petitioner offered exculpatory statements during the hearing,credibility issues were created for resolution by the Hearing Officer (see Matter of Gawlik v Fischer, 50AD3d 1282, 1283 [2008]).

Petitioner's remaining contentions have been examined and found to be unavailing.

Cardona, P.J., Mercure, Carpinello, Rose and Malone Jr., JJ., concur. Adjudged that thedetermination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.