People v Kyser
2008 NY Slip Op 08893 [56 AD3d 1216]
November 14, 2008
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 7, 2009


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v LashardKyser, Appellant.

[*1]The Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo, Inc., Buffalo (Michael C. Walsh of counsel), fordefendant-appellant.

Frank J. Clark, District Attorney, Buffalo (J. Michael Marion of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Shirley Troutman, J.), rendered June 15,2007. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of aweapon in the third degree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him, upon his plea of guilty,of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree (Penal Law § 265.02 [1]). Weconclude that County Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion of defendant towithdraw his plea before sentencing. "Permission to withdraw a guilty plea rests solely within thecourt's discretion . . . , and refusal to permit withdrawal does not constitute an abuseof that discretion unless there is some evidence of innocence, fraud, or mistake in inducing theplea" (People v Robertson, 255 AD2d 968 [1998], lv denied 92 NY2d 1053[1999]; see generally CPL 220.60 [3]). Here, the contention of defendant that he was notthinking clearly at the time of the plea and was pressured into accepting the plea by defensecounsel is "belied by his statements made under oath during the plea colloquy" (People v Spikes, 28 AD3d 1101,1102 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 818 [2006]). The further contention of defendant that heshould have been permitted to withdraw his plea because he was subject to an illegal search doesnot survive his valid waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Martin, 43 AD3d 1316, 1316-1317 [2007]; seealso People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831, 833 [1999]). In any event, that contention lacks merit. Itis well settled that " '[a] defendant is not entitled to withdraw his plea merely because hediscovers . . . that his calculus misapprehended the quality of the State's case' "(People v Jones, 44 NY2d 76, 81 [1978], cert denied 439 US 846, quotingBrady v United States, 397 US 742, 757 [1970]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Hurlbutt,Fahey, Peradotto and Pine, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.