| People v Joyce |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 00106 [58 AD3d 476] |
| January 13, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Michael Joyce, Appellant. |
—[*1] Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Marc Krupnick of counsel), forrespondent.
Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Gregory Carro, J.), rendered November 7,2007, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in thesecond degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a term of seven years,unanimously affirmed.
The court properly denied defendant's suppression motion. Late at night, police officersreceived a radio transmission about a gunpoint robbery which contained the location of the crimeand a description of the robber. Shortly after the robbery the officers saw defendant, whoapproximately matched the description, near the site of the robbery. The circumstances provided,at least, an objective credible reason (see People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223 [1976])to ask defendant for information. Since the lighting was dim, the officers asked defendant tocome closer. As defendant approached, the officers observed that he was walking at an angle,that his left bicep was stiff by his side while his left forearm was held at his waist, and that hewas shifting his body weight to his left side. An officer testified that, based on his experience,this pattern of conduct signified an attempt to conceal a handgun. We conclude that defendant'sbehavior, coupled with the circumstances suggesting his possible involvement in the robbery,[*2]provided reasonable suspicion to justify a frisk (seePeople v Soto, 266 AD2d 74 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 925 [2000]; comparePeople v Powell, 246 AD2d 366 [1998], appeal dismissed 92 NY2d 886 [1998]).
Motion seeking leave to file pro se brief denied.
Concur—Andrias, J.P., Nardelli, Moskowitz, Renwick and Freedman, JJ.