Sebag v Narvaez
2009 NY Slip Op 01844 [60 AD3d 485]
March 12, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, May 6, 2009


Jacques Sebag, Appellant,
v
Carlos Narvaez,Respondent.

[*1]Jacques Sebag, appellant pro se.

Green & Cohen, P.C., New York (Michael R. Cohen of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal from order, Supreme Court, New York County (Milton A. Tingling, J.), entered July1, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint, unanimously dismissed, withoutcosts, for failure to perfect the appeal in accordance with the CPLR and the rules of this Court.

An appellant is obliged to assemble a proper record on appeal including the transcript, if any,of the proceedings (see CPLR 5526; Rules of App Div, 1st Dept [22 NYCRR] §600.5). The pro se appellant's failure to include the trial transcript in the record before us rendersmeaningful appellate review of this matter impossible (see Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. vVargas, 288 AD2d 309, 310 [2001]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Acosta andRenwick, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.