Town of Hempstead v DeMasco
2009 NY Slip Op 03715 [62 AD3d 692]
May 5, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, July 1, 2009


Town of Hempstead, Appellant,
v
Joseph DeMasco et al.,Respondents.

[*1]Joseph J. Ra, Town Attorney, Hempstead, N.Y. (William J. Muller III of counsel), forappellant.

Richard L. Gumo, Delhi, N.Y., for respondents.

In an action to permanently enjoin the defendants from operating a junkyard or scrap metalbusiness, the plaintiff appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Galasso,J.), entered September 10, 2008, which, after a nonjury trial, is in favor of the defendants andagainst it denying a permanent injunction.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Upon review of a determination rendered after a nonjury trial, this Court's authority "is asbroad as that of the trial court," and this Court may "render the judgment it finds warranted bythe facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage ofseeing the witnesses" (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford,60 NY2d 492, 499 [1983]). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court'sdetermination.

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.P., Miller, Chambers andAustin, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.