| People v Coles |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 04258 [62 AD3d 1022] |
| May 26, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v Jeffrey Coles, Appellant. |
—[*1] Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove, Sholom J. Twersky,and Adam A. Nagorski of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Starkey, J.),rendered September 25, 2006, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the thirddegree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial,after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant's omnibus motion which was to suppress physicalevidence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the testimony of the arresting police officer was notincredible as a matter of law, as it was not " 'manifestly untrue, physically impossible, contraryto experience, or self-contradictory' " (People v Garafolo, 44 AD2d 86, 88 [1974],quoting 22 NY Jur Evidence § 649). Accordingly, suppression of the physical evidence inquestion was properly denied.
Furthermore, the defendant's contention that the trial court committed reversible error whenit instructed the jury on reasonable doubt is not preserved for appellate review, as the defendantdid not object to the instructions at the time they were given (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v McAloney, 2 AD3d 538,539 [2003]). In any event, the defendant's contention is without merit because the instructions,on the whole, conveyed the correct standard to be employed by the jury (see People v Fields,87 NY2d 821, 823 [1995]; People vLove, 37 AD3d 618, 619 [2007]; People v Sanchez, 29 AD3d 608 [2006]).
The defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Benevento, 91NY2d 708 [1998]). Rivera, J.P., Dillon, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.