| People v Pallonetti |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 04264 [62 AD3d 1027] |
| May 26, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| The People of the State of New York,Respondent, v James Pallonetti, Appellant. |
—[*1] Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and ShulamitRosenblum Nemec of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Tomei, J.),rendered June 5, 2006, convicting him of murder in the second degree, criminal possession of aweapon in the second degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, and petitlarceny, after a nonjury trial, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise itsdiscretion in failing to, sua sponte, order a competency examination. The defendant's responsesto the court's inquiries were appropriate, and there is no basis in the record to support theconclusion that the defendant lacked the capacity to understand the proceedings against him, orthat he was unable to assist in his defense (see People v Tortorici, 92 NY2d 757,765-766 [1999], cert denied 528 US 834 [1999]; People v Gelikkaya, 84 NY2d456, 459-460 [1994]; People vPryor, 11 AD3d 565, 566 [2004]). Moreover, the defendant was not denied the effectiveassistance of counsel because his attorney did not request a competency examination.
The defendant contends that rejection of his extreme emotional disturbance defense wasagainst the weight of the evidence (see Penal Law § 125.25 [1] [a]). However,upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict ofguilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]). Spolzino, J.P.,Santucci, Florio and Balkin, JJ., concur.