Arouh v Budget Leasing, Inc.
2009 NY Slip Op 04751 [63 AD3d 506]
June 11, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009


Michael Arouh, Appellant,
v
Budget Leasing, Inc., AlsoKnown as Roger Beasley Porsche, Respondent.

[*1]Michael Arouh, appellant pro se.

Murtagh, Cohen & Byrne, Rockville Centre (John E. Gray of counsel), forrespondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered May 2, 2008,which granted defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction,unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendant's negotiation of the potential purchase of an automobile via e-mail and telephone,which was initiated by plaintiff after viewing the car on defendant's web site, is insufficient toconstitute the "transaction" of business within New York (see Granat v Bochner, 268AD2d 365 [2000]), and, since the car was to be picked up in Texas, there was no contract to"supply goods or services in the state" (CPLR 302 [a] [1]). Defendant's web site, whichdescribed available cars and featured a link for e-mail contact but did not permit a customer topurchase a car, was not a projection of defendant into the state (see Haber v Studium,Inc., 22 Misc 3d 1129[A], 2009 NY Slip Op 50368[U], *4-5 [2009]). Concur—Tom,J.P., Nardelli, Catterson, Renwick and Richter, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.