Braxton v Jennings
2009 NY Slip Op 04848 [63 AD3d 772]
June 9, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 5, 2009


Jarius Braxton, Respondent,
v
Barbara Jennings,Appellant.

[*1]Richard T. Lau, Jericho, N.Y. (Keith E. Ford of counsel), for appellant.

Harmon, Linder & Rogowsky, New York, N.Y. (Mitchell Dranow of counsel), forrespondent.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order ofthe Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated May 27, 2008, which denied her motionfor summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendant's motion forsummary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

Regardless of whether we accept the plaintiff's or the defendant's version of the subjectaccident, the defendant established, prima facie, that she did not contribute to the accident andthat the sole proximate cause of the accident was the conduct of the infant plaintiff, whosuddenly stepped into the road when it was not safe for him to do so (see 34 RCNY 4-04[b] [2]; cf. Ryan v Budget Rent aCar, 37 AD3d 698 [2007]; Deitz v Huibregtse, 25 AD3d 645 [2006]; Ruocco vMulhall, 281 AD2d 406 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue offact. Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhal and Lott, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.