People v Jones
2009 NY Slip Op 05431 [64 AD3d 1158]
July 2, 2009
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 2, 2009


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v Jonathan O.Jones, Appellant.

[*1]Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Drew R. DuBrin of counsel), fordefendant-appellant.

Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Loretta S. Courtney of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (Richard A. Keenan, J.), rendered May26, 2005. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of murder in the seconddegree.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously reversed on the law,the plea is vacated and the matter is remitted to Monroe County Court for further proceedings onthe indictment.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty ofmurder in the second degree (Penal Law § 125.25 [2] [depraved indifference murder]).The contention of defendant that his guilty plea was not knowing, voluntary and intelligentsurvives his waiver of the right to appeal (see People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1, 10 [1989]).Furthermore, although defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review, we concludethat his statements during the plea colloquy cast significant doubt upon his guilt with respect tothe crime of depraved indifference murder, and thus this case falls within the exception to thepreservation requirement (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]).

The statements of defendant during the plea colloquy established an unintentional killing,during which he waved the gun at the victim and tried to use it as a bludgeon against the victim.Also according to the plea colloquy, during the course of the altercation the gun accidentallydischarged and caused the victim's death. We thus conclude that the factual allocution failed toestablish that defendant acted with a depraved indifference state of mind (People v Feingold, 7 NY3d 288,296 [2006]). Although defendant entered his guilty plea before the Court of Appeals decidedFeingold, which definitively stated for the first time that the depraved indifferenceelement of depraved indifference murder is a culpable mental state rather than the circumstancesunder which the killing is committed (see id. at 294), we nevertheless conclude thatFeingold applies herein inasmuch as this case was pending on direct appeal whenFeingold was decided (seePeople v Jean-Baptiste, 11 NY3d 539, 542-543 [2008]; People v Collins, 45 AD3d 1472,1473 [2007], lv denied 10 NY3d 861 [2008]). We therefore reverse the judgment ofconviction, vacate the plea and remit the matter to County Court for further proceedings on theindictment. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Fahey, Carni and Pine, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.