People ex rel. Brown v Artus
2009 NY Slip Op 05929 [64 AD3d 1064]
July 23, 2009
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 2, 2009


The People of the State of New York ex rel. Edward Brown,Appellant, v Dale Artus, as Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility,Respondent.

[*1]Edward Brown, Dannemora, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered October 27, 2008 inClinton County, which denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus, in aproceeding pursuant to CPLR article 70, without a hearing.

In 2002, petitioner was convicted by a jury of burglary in the first degree, criminalpossession of a weapon in the third degree, possession of stolen property in the fifth degree andresisting arrest and was sentenced to a minimum prison term of 22 years. Petitioner's convictionswere upheld on direct appeal (People vBrown, 16 AD3d 430, 431 [2005], lv denied 4 NY3d 852 [2005]). Hecommenced this CPLR article 70 proceeding seeking a writ of habeas corpus alleging variousconstitutional violations and certain jurisdictional defects. Supreme Court denied petitioner'sapplication without a hearing, prompting this appeal.

Habeas corpus relief is unavailable where, as here, petitioner's arguments could have beenraised either in the context of a collateral motion or upon a direct appeal from the judgment ofconviction (see People ex rel. Fulton vLape, 61 AD3d 1227, 1227-1228 [2009]). Moreover, a review of the record reflects thatpetitioner has unsuccessfully raised the identical issues in multiple prior state and federal habeascorpus proceedings. Under such circumstances, we [*2]perceiveno basis upon which to depart from traditional orderly procedure and Supreme Court's judgmentis affirmed (see People ex rel. Franza vLape, 61 AD3d 1200, 1200 [2009]).

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Lahtinen, Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgmentis affirmed, without costs.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.