Karin K. v Four Winds Hosp.
2009 NY Slip Op 05949 [64 AD3d 686]
July 21, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 2, 2009


Karin K., Respondent,
v
Four Winds Hospital et al.,Appellants.

[*1]Phelan, Phelan & Danek, LLP, Albany, N.Y. (Timothy S. Brennan, Stanley J. Tartaglia,Jr., and Robert Bartlett Phelan of counsel), for appellants.

Harvey S. Mars, LLC, New York, N.Y., for respondent.

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for the negligent infliction of emotional distress,the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Nicolai, J.),entered July 10, 2008, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing thecomplaint.

Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, and the defendants' motion forsummary judgment dismissing the complaint is granted.

The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for mental and emotional injuriesshe claims to have sustained as a result of the alleged disclosure by the defendants of her medicalinformation to a third party without her consent. The Supreme Court denied the defendants'motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. We reverse.

The defendants established their prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law bydemonstrating, through deposition testimony and transcripts of the relevant telephoneconversations, that they did not disclose the plaintiff's medical information (see McCormackv County of Westchester, 286 AD2d 24, 31 [2001]). In opposition, the plaintiff failed toraise a triable issue of fact by presenting any evidence of such disclosure (see Alvarez vProspect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324 [1986]). In any event, while a breach of a duty of care"resulting directly in emotional harm is compensable even though no physical injury occurred,"where the mental injury is "a direct, rather than a consequential, result of the breach"(Kennedy v McKesson Co., 58 NY2d 500, 504, 506 [1983]; see Ornstein v New York City Health &Hosps. Corp., 10 NY3d 1, 6 [2008]; Cleary v Wallace Oil Co., Inc., 55 AD3d 773, 775-776 [2008]; DiStefano v Nabisco, Inc., 2 AD3d484, 485 [2003]; Brown v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 225 AD2d 36, 44[1996]), the claim must "possess some guarantee of genuineness" (Ferrara v Galluchio, 5NY2d 16, 21 [1958]; see Ornstein v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 10 NY3d at6). Here, the plaintiff failed to demonstrate any such guarantee with respect to her claim ofmental or emotional injury.

The defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint should, [*2]therefore, have been granted. Spolzino, J.P., Angiolillo, Leventhaland Lott, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.