| Matter of Jasmine B. |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 07151 [66 AD3d 420] |
| October 6, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, First Department |
| In the Matter of Jasmine B. and Others, Children Alleged to beNeglected. Derrick B., Appellant; Administration for Children's Services,Respondent. |
—[*1] Aleza Ross, Central Islip, Law Guardian for Jasmine B. and Khiry B. Wendy J. Claffee, Bronx, Law Guardian for Shaniya B.
Order, Family Court, Bronx County (Monica Drinane, J.), entered on or about October 1,2007, which, after a hearing, found that respondent father had neglected the subject children,unanimously affirmed, without costs. Order of disposition, same court and Judge, entered on orabout November 14, 2007, which, after the fact-finding determination of neglect, placed thechild Shaniya B. with petitioner until the completion of the next permanency hearing,unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The record supports the court's credibility determinations made in connection with itsfinding that the father neglected the children by using drugs in the home and not participating inany rehabilitation program, and by expelling the oldest child from the home without making anyprovisions for her food or shelter (Family Ct Act § 1012 [f] [i] [A], [B]; see Matter of Angelyna G., 46 AD3d304 [2007]). Even if the father's claim that the oldest child was a persistent delinquent wereto be accepted, that would not itself terminate his support obligations (see Matter of Roe vDoe, 29 NY2d 188, 193 [1971]).
Further, evidence of the father's neglect of the oldest child and use of physical violencetoward both older children supports the implicit finding of derivative neglect of Shaniya, sincehis "behavior demonstrated such an impaired level of parental judgment as to create a substantialrisk of harm for any child in his care" (Matter of Joshua R., 47 AD3d 465, 466 [2008], lv denied11 NY3d 703 [2008]; see Matter of Vincent M., 193 AD2d 398, 404 [1993]).Concur—Saxe, J.P., Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Richter, JJ.