People v Smith
2009 NY Slip Op 07445 [66 AD3d 801]
October 13, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
LarrySmith, Appellant.

[*1]Lynn W. L. Fahey, New York, N.Y. (Jonathan M. Kratter of counsel), for appellant.

Charles J. Hynes, District Attorney, Brooklyn, N.Y. (Leonard Joblove and Howard B.Goodman of counsel), for respondent.

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hall, J.),rendered July 8, 2005, convicting him of murder in the first degree (two counts), upon a juryverdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant contends that the Supreme Court erred in denying his Batsonchallenge (see Batson v Kentucky, 476 US 79 [1986]) because the prosecutor'sexplanations for striking a black female prospective juror were pretextual. However, thedefendant's challenge was properly denied since he failed to satisfy his burden of demonstrating,under the third prong of the Batson analysis, that the facially race-neutral andgender-neutral explanations given by the prosecutor were a pretext for discrimination (seePeople v Payne, 88 NY2d 172, 181 [1996]).

The defendant's remaining contention is without merit. Rivera, J.P., Florio, Eng andLeventhal, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.