AMS Prods., LLC v Signorile
2009 NY Slip Op 07776 [66 AD3d 929]
October 27, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, December 9, 2009


AMS Products, LLC, Doing Business as Object DesignManufacturing, Appellant,
v
Paul L. Signorile, Respondent.

[*1]Wolfe & Yukelson PLLC, Port Washington, N.Y. (Bruce Yukelson of counsel), forappellant.

In an action to recover damages for breach of contract and for a permanent injunction, interalia, enjoining the defendant from soliciting directly or indirectly any of the customers of hisformer company, the assets of which he sold to the plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals, as limited byits brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Warshawsky, J.),entered May 9, 2008, as granted its motion for a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendantfrom manufacturing or selling such goods in the New York City metropolitan area as weremanufactured and sold by that company.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

Only an aggrieved party may appeal from an order or judgment pursuant to CPLR 5511 (see Unitrin Advantage Ins. Co. v Duclaire,49 AD3d 863 [2008]). Where a party obtains the relief it seeks from the Supreme Court,is not aggrieved by that order (id.; see DiMare v O'Rourke, 35 AD3d 346 [2006]; Evans v NabConstr. Corp., 80 AD2d 841 [1981]).

Here, the plaintiff, by its motion, sought a preliminary injunction enjoining the defendantfrom "engaging in any business, trade or occupation" within the New York City metropolitanarea that was "similar to the one" he sold to the plaintiff. The Supreme Court granted all of therelief requested in the plaintiff's motion. Consequently, the plaintiff is not an aggrieved party.

To the extent that the plaintiff requests relief on this appeal which was not sought before theSupreme Court, that request is not properly before this Court. Mastro, J.P., Miller, Angiolillo andAustin, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.