People v Pinero-Baez
2009 NY Slip Op 08060 [67 AD3d 469]
November 10, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010


The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
JosePinero-Baez, Appellant.

[*1]Robert S. Dean, Center for Appellate Litigation, New York (John Vang of counsel), forappellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (Michael J. Balch of counsel), forrespondent.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (William A. Wetzel, J.), rendered June 9,2008, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of assault in the second degree, and sentencing him,as a second violent felony offender, to a term of five years, and judgment, same court (RichardCarruthers, J.), rendered July 16, 2008, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robberyin the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second violent felony offender, to a concurrentterm of 10 years, unanimously affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the People to introduce a threateningstatement, containing the words "I shoot people," that defendant made to a court officer who wastrying to escort him back to Department of Correction custody following a court appearance.This entire statement, including the quoted phrase, expressed a threat to use force against theofficer, and was highly probative of defendant's intent to prevent the officer "from performing alawful duty" (Penal Law § 120.05 [3]). In any event, even if the phrase "I shoot people"should have been redacted, its admission was harmless.

The verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 348-349 [2007]). There wasample evidence to support the element of physical injury (see e.g. People v Wade, 41 AD3d 288[2007], lv denied 9 NY3d 883 [2007]). That element can be established through avictim's credible description of his or her injuries (see People v Guidice, 83 [*2]NY2d 630, 636 [1994]); in any event, the officer's testimony wascorroborated by medical records.

We perceive no basis for reducing the sentence. Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Renwick,DeGrasse and Richter, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.