Matter of Lorelei M. (Andrew M.)
2009 NY Slip Op 08318 [67 AD3d 1383]
November 13, 2009
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010


In the Matter of Lorelei M., an Infant. Chautauqua CountyDepartment of Social Services, Respondent; Andrew M. et al.,Appellants.

[*1]Stasia Zoladz Vogel, Derby, for respondents-appellants. Barbara L. Widrig, Mayville,for petitioner-respondent.

Ronald A. Szot, Law Guardian, Dunkirk, for Lorelei M.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Chautauqua County (Margaret O. Szczur, J.),entered April 8, 2008 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10. The order, amongother things, adjudicated the subject child to be a neglected child.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: In this neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10,respondent parents appeal from an order adjudicating their daughter to be a neglected child.Contrary to the parents' contention, petitioner presented evidence establishing that the physical,mental or emotional condition of the child has been impaired or is in imminent danger ofbecoming impaired as a result of her parents' failure to exercise a minimum degree of care inproviding her with adequate food and medical care (see § 1012 [f] [i] [A]).Petitioner established that the child failed to thrive because she was undernourished, and that hercondition was "of such a nature as would ordinarily not . . . exist except by reasonof the acts or omissions of the parent[s]" (§ 1046 [a] [ii]; see Matter of Kayla C., 19 AD3d692 [2005]; Matter of Camara R., 263 AD2d 710, 712 [1999]; Matter ofCommissioner of Social Servs., Child Welfare Admin. (Diane W.), 182 AD2d 589 [1992]).

We have examined the parents' remaining contentions and conclude that they are eitherunpreserved or without merit. Present—Scudder, P.J., Martoche, Smith, Carni and Green,JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.