People v Sam
2009 NY Slip Op 08595 [67 AD3d 876]
November 17, 2009
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, January 6, 2010


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Jerome Sam, Appellant.

[*1]Robert C. Mitchell, Riverhead, N.Y. (James H. Miller III of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas J. Spota, District Attorney, Riverhead, N.Y. (Ronnie Jane Lamm of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.),dated May 9, 2008, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant toCorrection Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant failed to demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that there existed amitigating factor of a kind or to a degree not otherwise taken into account by the guidelines (see People v Jacobs, 61 AD3d 835[2009]; People v Serrano, 61 AD3d946, 947 [2009]; People vAbdullah, 31 AD3d 515, 516 [2006]). The factors relied upon by the defendant, alcoholabuse and his relationship with the victim, are expressly addressed in the SORA guidelines (see People v Perez, 61 AD3d 946[2009]; People v Townsend, 60AD3d 655 [2009]). The County Court appropriately designated the defendant a level twosex offender and providently exercised its discretion in denying his request for a downwarddeparture. Fisher, J.P., Angiolillo, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.