| Matter of Deans |
| 2009 NY Slip Op 09025 [68 AD3d 767] |
| December 1, 2009 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| In the Matter of Estate of Livingston Mandel Deans, Deceased.Sharon Deans et al., Respondents; Felipe Orner et al., Respondents. Real Spec Ventures, LLC,Nonparty Appellant. |
—[*1] Felipe Orner, Flushing, N.Y., objectant respondent pro se, and for objectant respondentJacklyn Deans. Baker Greenspan & Bernstein, Bellmore, N.Y. (William R. Greenspan of counsel), forobjectant respondent Brandon Deans.
In a proceeding to settle the account of Sharon Deans as the former coadministrator of theestate of Livingston Mandel Deans, nonparty Real Spec Ventures, LLC, appeals from so much ofa decree of the Surrogate's Court, Queens County (Nahman, S.), dated April 28, 2008, asdirected the cancellation of a mortgage which it issued in the amount of $370,000.
Ordered that the decree is modified, on the law, by adding to the eighth decretal paragraphthereof the words "to the extent of any interest held by the Estate of Livingston Mandel Deans"immediately following the words "State of New York;" as so modified, the decree is affirmedinsofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The decedent Livingston Mandel Deans, his father Byron, and his second wife Sharon R.Stephenson, purchased a commercial property in Queens (hereinafter the property) pursuant to a1991 deed which granted each of them a one-third interest in the property as tenants in common.The decedent died intestate in 2001, approximately five years after his 1996 marriage to SharonR. Stephenson (hereinafter Deans). The distributees of the decedent's estate were his twochildren and Deans, pursuant to the provisions of the Estates, Powers and Trusts Law.
After letters of administration were granted to Deans and her attorney, Deans purported toconvey the property to herself in a 2003 deed in which she forged the signature of the decedent'sadult daughter as "all the heirs at law and next of kin of Livingston M. Deans, Deceased." Deansthen obtained a $370,000 mortgage (hereinafter the mortgage) from Real Spec Ventures, LLC(hereinafter Real Spec), using a fraudulent document which she executed with someone shepresented as the decedent's father, [*2]Byron Deans.
Deans filed her account as the former coadministrator of the decedent's estate after theSurrogate's Court revoked her letters of administration and directed her to file her account. Aftera trial on the objections to the account, the Surrogate's Court determined, inter alia, that the 2003deed and the mortgage were void as fraudulent, and directed the County Registrar to cancel therecording of the 2003 deed and the mortgage.
The limited jurisdiction of the Surrogate's Court does not extend "to independent mattersinvolving controversies between living persons" (Matter of Lainez, 79 AD2d 78, 80[1981]). Thus, the Surrogate's Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to determine that themortgage should be cancelled in its entirety where living persons owned the remaining interestsin the property pursuant to the 1991 deed, which remains valid (cf. Matter of Lupoli, 237AD2d 440 [1997]; Matter of Burns, 228 AD2d 674 [1996]; Matter of Simonson,271 App Div 420, 422 [1946]). Accordingly, the decree must be modified to indicate that thecancellation of the subject mortgage does not encompass the interests of any living persons inthe property and is limited to any interest held by the estate of Livingston Mandel Deans.
In light of our determination, Real Spec's remaining contentions are academic. Dillon, J.P.,Dickerson, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.