People v Agnew
2009 NY Slip Op 09281 [68 AD3d 526]
December 15, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010


The People of the State of New York,Respondent,
v
Gerald Agnew, Appellant.

[*1]Steven Banks, The Legal Aid Society, New York (Arthur H. Hopkirk of counsel), forappellant.

Robert M. Morgenthau, District Attorney, New York (John B.F. Martin of counsel), forrespondent.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Ronald A. Zweibel, J.), entered on or aboutJanuary 12, 2009, which adjudicated defendant a level three sex offender under the Sex OffenderRegistration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly applied the presumptive override for a prior felony sex crime conviction,and properly denied defendant's request for a downward departure (see People v Judd, 29 AD3d 431[2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 709 [2006]). There is no support for defendant's position thatthe override was not intended to apply when one of the felonies involved an undercoveroperation, rather than an actual underage victim. Defendant's conduct demonstrated a high riskof sexual recidivism, not lessened by the fact that the crime was only an attempt, or the fact thatthe intended victim, believed by defendant to be a child, was actually an undercover officer.Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Moskowitz, DeGrasse, Manzanet-Daniels and Roman, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.