ESE Funding SPC Ltd. v Morgan Stanley
2009 NY Slip Op 09718 [68 AD3d 676]
December 29, 2009
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, February 10, 2010


ESE Funding SPC Ltd., Appellant,
v
Morgan Stanley etal., Respondents.

[*1]Scarola Ellis LLP, New York (Richard J.J. Scarola of counsel), for appellant.

Venable LLP, New York (Edward P. Boyle of counsel), for respondents.

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barbara R. Kapnick, J.), entered January 29,2009, which, to the extent appealed from, granted that portion of defendants' motion to dismissthe 9th, 10th and 11th causes of action, alleging negligent misrepresentation, unanimouslyaffirmed, with costs.

Plaintiff negotiated an arm's length commercial contract with defendant Morgan StanleyAltabridge to purchase defendants' financial risk associated with a third-party securitytransaction. Plaintiff has made no showing that any of these defendants had a "specialrelationship" with plaintiff (cf. Kimmell v Schaefer, 89 NY2d 257 [1996]).

We have reviewed plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Acosta, DeGrasse and RomÁn, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.