Pipero v New York City Tr. Auth.
2010 NY Slip Op 00390 [69 AD3d 493]
January 21, 2010
Appellate Division, First Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 10, 2010


Michael G. Pipero, Jr., Respondent,
v
New York CityTransit Authority, Appellant.

[*1]Wallace D. Gossett, Brooklyn (Lawrence Heisler of counsel), for appellant. Birbrower& Beldock, P.C., New City (Jeffrey B. Saunders of counsel), for respondent.

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Larry S. Schachner, J.), entered January 16, 2009,which, in an action for personal injuries allegedly sustained as a result of a slip and fall on snowand ice, denied defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint,unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant made a prima facie showing that plaintiff fell during a storm in progress bysubmitting certified weather records showing that snow began the day before plaintiff's accidentand, while the intensity decreased, continued through the end of the day of plaintiff's fall (see Pippo v City of New York, 43AD3d 303, 304 [2007]; Powell v MLG Hillside Assoc., 290 AD2d 345 [2002]).

In opposition, plaintiff raised a triable issue of fact as to whether a storm was in progress atthe time of the accident based on his deposition testimony that it had not snowed on the day ofhis accident and that the snow had existed since the previous day (see Mosley v General Chauncey M.Hooper Towers Hous. Dev. Fund Co., Inc., 48 AD3d 379, 380 [2008]). Plaintiff alsoraised a triable issue of fact as to whether the weather reports clearly indicate that the accidentoccurred while the storm was still in progress or whether there was a significant lull in the storm(see Powell, 290 AD2d at 346; compare Ioele v Wal-Mart Stores, 290 AD2d614, 616 [2002]).

Furthermore, even if a storm was in progress at the time of the incident, plaintiff's testimonyand defendant's own records raise issues of fact as to whether defendant gratuitously andnegligently performed snow and ice removal operations and as to whether its failure to placesand or salt on the stairs created or exacerbated a dangerous condition (see Sanchez v City of New [*2]York, 48 AD3d 275 [2008]; Prenderville v International Serv. Sys.,Inc., 10 AD3d 334, 337-338 [2004]). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny,Catterson and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.