Matter of Tusa v Bezio
2010 NY Slip Op 01042 [70 AD3d 1159]
February 11, 2010
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, March 31, 2010


In the Matter of Frank Tusa, Petitioner,
v
Norman Bezio,as Director of Special Housing and Inmate Disciplinary Programs,Respondent.

[*1]Frank Tusa, Woodburne, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), forrespondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the SupremeCourt, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of CorrectionalServices which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.

Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with tampering with state property andpossessing stolen property. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guiltyof possessing stolen property and a penalty was imposed. That determination was affirmed onadministrative appeal, and this CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. Contrary to petitioner's contention, the misbehavior report, together with thehearing testimony of the correction officer who authored it, provide substantial evidence insupport of the determination of guilt (see Matter of Sanders v Goord, 47 AD3d 987, 988 [2008]; Matter of Smith v Goord, 45 AD3d1119, 1120 [2007]). Significantly, the correction officer testified that petitioner admitted tohim that he had possessed and read a letter written by another inmate, addressed to the facility'sdeputy of security, which he had removed from the cellblock mailbox. The contrary testimony ofpetitioner and his inmate witness presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve(see Matter of Ortiz v Fischer, 64AD3d 1111, 1112 [2009]). Additionally, there is no support in the record for petitioner'scontention that the Hearing Officer was biased or that the determination flowed from any bias(see Matter of Warren [*2]v Fischer, 63 AD3d 1466, 1467 [2009]).

Mercure, J.P., Peters, Malone Jr., Stein and Garry, JJ., concur. Adjudged that thedetermination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.