| Matter of Betancourt v Betancourt |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 01958 [71 AD3d 764] |
| March 9, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| In the Matter of Alberto Betancourt, Appellant, v LisaBetancourt, Respondent. |
—[*1]
In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals (1)from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Harper, J.), dated December 23, 2008, whichdenied his objections to so much of an order of the same court (La Freniere, S.M.), dated June 4,2008, as, after a hearing, denied those branches of his motion which were to reduce his childsupport arrears to the sum of $500 and to reduce his child support obligation to the sum of $25per month, and (2) from an order of the same court (La Freniere, S.M.), dated January 16, 2009,which, among other things, reinstated a prior support order of the same court dated April 21,2002, obligating him to pay child support in the sum of $61 per week.
Ordered that the orders are affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Contrary to the father's contention, the evidence in the record was insufficient to establishthat he was entitled to a $500 limit on the accrual of total unpaid child support arrears pursuantto Family Court Act § 413 (1) (g) (see Matter of Conwell v Booth, 66 AD3d 773 [2009]; Matter ofTelfer v Maher, 270 AD2d 494 [2000]). Further, the father failed to demonstrate that he wasentitled to a reduction of his child support obligation to the sum of $25 per month (seeFamily Ct Act § 413 [1] [d]).
The father's remaining contentions are not properly before this Court, as they were not raisedin his objections to the Support Magistrate's order dated June 4, 2008 (see Matter of Forman v Frost, 67AD3d 908, 909 [2009]; Matter ofCorr v Corr, 3 AD3d 567 [2004]). Covello, J.P., Miller, Dickerson and Belen, JJ.,concur.