| Matter of Kneip v McWilliams |
| 2010 NY Slip Op 02149 [71 AD3d 895] |
| March 16, 2010 |
| Appellate Division, Second Department |
| In the Matter of Robert S. Kneip, Appellant, v ElizabethMcWilliams, Respondent. |
—[*1] Gary E. Eisenberg, New City, N.Y., attorney for the child.
In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court article 6 in which the fatherpetitioned for a writ of habeas corpus, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from statedportions of an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Duffy, J.), entered April 3, 2009.
Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The father concedes that his petition for a writ of habeas corpus was properly dismissed. Onappeal, the father only challenges the Family Court's findings of fact and conclusions of law.Thus, the appeal must be dismissed, as findings of fact and conclusions of law are not separatelyappealable (see Lester & Assoc., P.C. vEneman, 69 AD3d 906 [2010]; Meachum v Outdoor World Corp., 273 AD2d208 [2000]). Skelos, J.P., Santucci, Angiolillo and Chambers, JJ., concur.