Matter of Demariah A. (Rebecca B.)
2010 NY Slip Op 02276 [71 AD3d 1469]
March 19, 2010
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010


In the Matter of Demariah A. Erie County Department of SocialServices, Respondent; Rebecca B., Appellant, et al., Respondent.

[*1]Charles J. Greenberg, Buffalo, for respondent-appellant. Joseph T. Jarzembek, Buffalo,for petitioner-respondent. David C. Schopp, Law Guardian, the Legal Aid Bureau of Buffalo,Inc., Buffalo (Charles D. Halvorsen of counsel), for Demariah A.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Patricia A. Maxwell, J.), enteredMarch 18, 2009 in a proceeding pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b. The order,insofar as appealed from, terminated the parental rights of respondent Rebecca B.

It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Respondent mother appeals from an order terminating her parental rightswith respect to one of her children on the ground of mental illness. We affirm. Petitioner met itsburden of demonstrating by clear and convincing evidence that the mother is presently and forthe foreseeable future unable to provide proper and adequate care for the child by reason ofmental illness (see Social Services Law § 384-b [4] [c]; [6] [a]). "The failure of the[court-appointed] psychologist to provide a precise, clinically accepted diagnosis does not renderhis testimony legally insufficient to satisfy the statutory mandate" (Matter of Dylan K.,269 AD2d 826, 827 [2000], lv denied 95 NY2d 766 [2000]).

Contrary to the contention of the mother, a separate dispositional hearing is not requiredfollowing the determination that she is unable to care for the child because of mental illness(see Matter of Sylvia M., 82 AD2d 217, 235 [1981], affd 57 NY2d 636 [1982],rearg denied 57 NY2d 775 [1982]). Finally, contrary to the further contention of themother, we conclude that she " 'failed to demonstrate that she was afforded less than meaningfulrepresentation by counsel' " (Matter ofMatthew B., 24 AD3d 1183, 1183 [2005]). Present—Smith, J.P., Fahey, Carni,Sconiers and Pine, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.