People v Hernandez
2010 NY Slip Op 02324 [71 AD3d 1501]
March 19, 2010
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
As corrected through Wednesday, April 28, 2010


The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v AlexanderHernandez, Appellant.

[*1]Timothy P. Donaher, Public Defender, Rochester (Grazina Myers of counsel), fordefendant-appellant.

Michael C. Green, District Attorney, Rochester (Nancy A. Gilligan of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Monroe County Court (John R. Schwartz, A.J.), renderedDecember 15, 2006. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of sexual abusein the first degree (three counts) and endangering the welfare of a child (three counts).

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him following a nonjury trialof three counts each of sexual abuse in the first degree (Penal Law § 130.65 [1]) andendangering the welfare of a child (§ 260.10 [1]). We reject defendant's contention thatCounty Court erred in admitting the testimony of an expert concerning Child Sexual AbuseAccommodation Syndrome (see Peoplev Gunther, 67 AD3d 1477 [2009]; People v Krause, 187 AD2d 1019, 1020[1992], lv denied 81 NY2d 842 [1993]). Viewing the evidence in light of the elements ofthe crimes in this nonjury trial (seePeople v Danielson, 9 NY3d 342, 349 [2007]), we reject defendant's further contentionthat the verdict is against the weight of the evidence (see generally People v Bleakley, 69NY2d 490, 495 [1987]). The court's determination to credit the testimony of the victim is entitledto deference, and we see no reason to disturb that determination (see People v Stone, 49 AD3d1314 [2008], lv denied 10 NY3d 965 [2008]). Defendant failed to preserve for ourreview his contention that the court erred in setting the expiration date of the order of protection(see People v Nieves, 2 NY3d310, 315-317 [2004]). In any event, that contention is without merit inasmuch as the courtproperly specified an expiration date in accordance with CPL 530.13 (former [4]), the version ofthe statute in effect when the judgment was rendered (see People v Lake, 45 AD3d 1409, 1410-1411 [2007], lvdenied 10 NY3d 767 [2008]; People v Moss [appeal No. 1], 45 AD3d 1412 [2007],lv denied 10 NY3d 768 [2008]). Present—Scudder, P.J., Sconiers, Green andGorski, JJ.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.