Matter of Morusma v Fischer
2010 NY Slip Op 05637 [74 AD3d 1675]
June 24, 2010
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, August 25, 2010


In the Matter of Jean Morusma, Petitioner, v Brian Fischer, asCommissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[*1]Jean Morusma, New York City, petitioner pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), forrespondent.

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the SupremeCourt, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which foundpetitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

When a female correction officer failed to respond to a series of personal questions asked bypetitioner, petitioner proceeded to stare at her in a manner that made her uncomfortable. Hecontinued to stare at her even after she directed him to stop. As a result, petitioner was chargedin a misbehavior report with stalking, harassment and refusing a direct order. Following a tier IIIdisciplinary hearing, he was found guilty of the charges. On administrative appeal, the stalkingcharge was dismissed, but the determination of guilt was upheld with respect to the remainingcharges. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of its author, providesubstantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Williams v Fischer, 69 AD3d 1278, 1278 [2010];Matter of Crews v O'Keefe, 283 AD2d 692, 693 [2001]). Petitioner's contrary version ofevents presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Lashley v Goord, 39AD3d 1105, 1106 [2007]). We reject petitioner's claim that the hearing was not completedin a timely manner inasmuch as proper extensions were obtained and the hearing was completedwithin the time specified in the second extension (see Matter of Ifill v Fischer, 72 AD3d 1367, 1368 [2010]; Matter of McKinley v Goord, 44AD3d 1164 [2007]). Petitioner's challenge to the sufficiency of the misbehavior report hasnot been preserved for our [*2]review.

Cardona, P.J., Rose, Lahtinen, Stein and McCarthy, JJ., concur. Adjudged that thedetermination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.