Zanani v Schvimmer
2010 NY Slip Op 06086 [75 AD3d 546]
July 13, 2010
Appellate Division, Second Department
As corrected through Wednesday, September 1, 2010


Doron Zanani, Respondent,
v
Miriam Schvimmer et al.,Defendants, and 238 Rodney LLC, Appellant.

[*1]Goldberg & Rimberg, PLLC, New York, N.Y. (Israel Goldberg of counsel), forappellant.

Doron Zanani, New York, N.Y., respondent pro se.

In an action, inter alia, to set aside an allegedly fraudulent conveyance, the defendant 238Rodney, LLC, appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court,Kings County (Rothenberg, J.), dated January 5, 2009, as granted that branch of the plaintiff'smotion which was for leave to enter a default judgment against it and denied its cross motion,among other things, to compel the plaintiff to accept its answer.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

A party seeking to vacate a default in appearing pursuant to CPLR 5015 (a) (1) mustdemonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a potentiallymeritorious defense (see e.g. Wauchopev Williams, 71 AD3d 876, 877 [2010]; HSBC Bank USA N.A. v Nuteh 72 Realty Corp., 70 AD3d 998[2010]). The appellant failed to meet that burden. Its remaining contentions are without merit.Prudenti, P.J., Rivera, Santucci and Miller, JJ., concur.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.