Matter of Davis v Fischer
2010 NY Slip Op 06734 [76 AD3d 1152]
September 30, 2010
Appellate Division, Third Department
As corrected through Wednesday, October 27, 2010


In the Matter of Donnell E. Davis, Appellant, v Brian Fischer, asCommissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.

[*1]Donnell E. Davis, Comstock, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Martin A. Hotvet of counsel), forrespondent.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Egan, Jr., J.), entered September 18, 2009 inAlbany County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLRarticle 78, to review a determination of the Central Office Review Committee denyingpetitioner's grievance.

Petitioner, an inmate at Great Meadow Correction Facility in Washington County,commenced this proceeding challenging a decision by the Central Office Review Committee(hereinafter CORC) that denied his request to purchase and possess compact discs and a compactdisc player, pursuant to Department of Correctional Services Directive No. 4911. Supreme Courtdismissed petitioner's application to annul CORC's determination, and petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. "[C]orrection facility officials must be accorded wide latitude in their efforts toensure the safety and security of correctional facilities under their supervision and, in that regard,have . . . the obligation, to control what property is permitted to be introduced intothese facilities" (Matter of Frejomil vFischer, 59 AD3d 790, 791 [2009]; see Matter of Marcelin v Coughlin, 193AD2d 981, 982 [1993]). Here, where it is undisputed that compact discs and compact discplayers are not among those items permitted to be possessed by inmates pursuant to DirectiveNo. 4911, we find that CORC's determination denying petitioner's grievance was based upon arational interpretation of the directive and, therefore, has not been proven to be arbitrary andcapricious (see Matter of Frejomil vFischer, 68 AD3d 1371, 1372 [2009]; Matter of Rivera [*2]v Fischer, 67 AD3d1140, 1141 [2009]).

Petitioner's remaining contentions have been considered and found to be without merit.

Cardona, P.J., Peters, Rose, Malone Jr. and Garry, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment isaffirmed, without costs.


NYPTI Decisions © 2026 is a project of New York Prosecutors Training Institute (NYPTI) made possible by leveraging the work we've done providing online research and tools to prosecutors.

NYPTI would like to thank New York State Division of Criminal Justice Services, New York State Senate's Open Legislation Project, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Law Reporting Bureau and Free Law Project for their invaluable assistance making this project possible.

Install the free RECAP extensions to help contribute to this archive. See https://free.law/recap/ for more information.